Today's environmental movement, though well meaning, is
entrenched in several logical fallacies.
These include definitions of nature, wilderness, and our place as humans
in the natural world. Ideas of a
pristine untouched wilderness often ignore millennia of human interaction, and
even natural disturbances, while an obsession over the sublime artificially
creates a human centric wildland value system that disregards many diverse
ecosystems.
Cronon touched upon the environmentalist's artificial wilderness. The construction of which often includes some
forested climax community encased in an impressive mountainous visage. Of course these areas are beautiful, and it
is great to think that they can be preserved to some romanticized snapshot of
the past. But the idea that a landscape
removed of people will return to that of "pristine" and "wilderness"
ignores the fact that these habitats are fragmented, inundated with invasive
species, removed of the original native American influences, and experiencing
indirect human influences from fire suppression to increases in atmospheric CO2
to climate change. There is a logical
disconnect here in the environmentalist's world that somehow you can believe in
"climate change" and "current wilderness potential as historic natural vegetation" simultaneously. The latter can't exist in today's world
without management, and yet management is often anathema to the
environmentalist's constructed wilderness.
The obsession over the sublime ignores equally valuable but
less charismatic landscapes. These often
include grasslands, shrublands, and deserts.
These are not afforded the protection of mountainous forests, but
instead are often targeted as sacrificial areas to support a green
environmental agenda. Wind power is
strongly supported by environmentalists, but this has caused a crisscross of
invasive weed spreading industrial class roads across several non-sublime landscapes. Crisscrossed roads that mirror the often environmentally criticized oil fields. Also, the incidental kills of these wind turbines
threaten several bird species, may soon put the Bald Eagle back on the endangered
species list, and there is even one wind power plant in California that is
legally allowed to take a California Condor.
![]() | |
| Left: The Horrible destructive road system caused by Natural Gas extraction in Wyoming. Right: The wondrous beauty and sustainable road system caused by wind power in Texas. |
Solar power has similar problems. Though sustainable if used as solar panels on
rooftops, instead entire non-sublime landscapes are being plowed over. Take the new Ivanpah Solar power plant in
southern Nevada. At 5 square miles it is
the largest of its kind in the world, costing four times more than a
traditional coal fired power plant for a fraction of the energy. This Mojave desert landscape also happened to
be prime endangered desert tortoise habitat.
Environmentalists took note and relocated approximately 200 desert
tortoises at a cost of $55,000 each. But
as habitat destruction is a leading cause of extinctions worldwide, there is
little comfort knowing that environmentalists are looking to sacrifice more of
these non-sublime landscapes in the name of green energy and environmental
sustainability.
![]() |
| Ivanpah Solar Power Plant. Environmentally sustainable complete replacement of Mojave Desert. Photo by NPR. |
Today's environmental movement does mean well, but as they
ignore reality in favor of the fallacies of a constructed sublime they start to
make unrealistic demands and start to cause more harm than good. Landscapes are worth protecting, but not by
banning people and naively hoping for the best; but by a logical measured
approach using the best available science and "any" tools available. Wishing for the past is okay, as is planning
for the future, but they both will require management to succeed.


No comments:
Post a Comment